Current:Home > InvestProsecutors urge judge not to toss out Trump’s hush money conviction, pushing back on immunity claim -FundWay
Prosecutors urge judge not to toss out Trump’s hush money conviction, pushing back on immunity claim
View
Date:2025-04-27 18:06:28
NEW YORK (AP) — Prosecutors are urging a judge to uphold Donald Trump’s historic hush money conviction, arguing in court papers made public Thursday that the verdict should stand despite the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office said in a court filing that the high court’s opinion “has no bearing” on the hush money case because it involves unofficial acts for which a former president is not immune.
“There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s verdict,” prosecutors wrote in a 66-page filing.
Lawyers for the Republican presidential nominee are trying to get the verdict — and even the indictment — tossed out because of the Supreme Court’s decision July 1. The ruling insulates former presidents from being criminally prosecuted for official acts and bars prosecutors from pointing to official acts as evidence that a commander in chief’s unofficial actions were illegal.
That decision came about a month after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of falsifying business records to conceal a deal to pay off porn actor Stormy Daniels shortly before the 2016 election. At the time, she was considering going public with a story of a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump, who says no such thing happened. He has denied any wrongdoing.
Trump was a private citizen when his then-lawyer, Michael Cohen, paid Daniels. But Trump was president when Cohen was reimbursed. Prosecutors say those repayments were misleadingly logged simply as legal expenses in Trump’s company records. Cohen testified that he and Trump discussed the repayment arrangement in the Oval Office.
Trump’s lawyers have argued that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court’s view on presidential immunity, and that the trial was “tainted” by evidence that should not have been allowed under the high court’s ruling.
Judge Juan M. Merchan plans to rule Sept. 6 on the Trump lawyers’ request. The judge has set Trump’s sentencing for Sept. 18, “if such is still necessary” after he reaches his conclusions about immunity.
The sentencing, which carries the potential for anything from probation to up to four years in prison, initially was set for mid-July. But within hours of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump’s team asked to delay the sentencing. Merchan soon pushed the sentencing back to consider their immunity arguments.
Under the Supreme Court’s decision, lower courts are largely the ones that will have to figure out what constitutes an official act.
Indeed, even the conservative justices responsible for the majority opinion differed about what is proper for jurors to hear about a president’s conduct.
In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the Constitution does not require juries to be blinded “to the circumstances surrounding conduct for which presidents can be held liable” and suggested that it would needlessly “hamstring” a prosecutor’s case to prohibit any mention of an official act in question.
Before the Supreme Court ruling, Trump’s lawyers brought up presidential immunity in a failed bid last year to get the hush money case moved from state court to federal court.
Later, they tried to hold off the hush money trial until the Supreme Court ruled on his immunity claim, which arose from a separate prosecution — the Washington-based federal criminal case surrounding Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss.
Trump’s lawyers never raised presidential immunity as a defense in the hush money trial, but they tried unsuccessfully to prevent prosecutors from showing the jury evidence from his time in office.
veryGood! (238)
Related
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Travel-Friendly Water Bottles That Don't Spill, Leak or Get Moldy & Gross
- Wisconsin police officer fatally shoots armed motorist after chase
- Union reaches deal with 4 hotel-casinos, 3 others still poised to strike at start of Super Bowl week
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Chicagoland mansion formerly owned by R. Kelly, Rudolph Isley, up for sale. See inside
- Michigan woman holiday wish turned into reality after winning $500,000 from lottery game
- Controversial podcast host Joe Rogan signs a new deal with Spotify for up to a reported $250 million
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Oklahoma’s oldest Native American school, Bacone College, is threatened by debts and disrepair
Ranking
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Miley Cyrus Makes First Red Carpet Appearance in 10 Months at Grammys 2024
- Dog rescued by Coast Guard survived in shipping container for 8 days with no food, water
- 2024 Grammys: Maluma Reveals Why He’s Understandably Nervous for Fatherhood
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Harry Edwards, civil rights icon and 49ers advisor, teaches life lessons amid cancer fight
- Inferno set off by gas blast in Kenya's capital injures hundreds, kills several; It was like an earthquake
- Grammy Awards 2024 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look as the Stars Arrive
Recommendation
Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
Abortion access on the ballot in 2024
Senate Democrats face steep odds in trying to hold majority in November
Claims that Jan. 6 rioters are ‘political prisoners’ endure. Judges want to set the record straight
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Who won at the Grammys? Here's a complete winner list
Grammys 2024: Paris Jackson Covers Up 80+ Tattoos For Unforgettable Red Carpet Moment
Denver shooting injures at least 6 people, police say